Vision Three - the Roots and Role of Roman Power Revelation Chapter 13
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and
upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: ...
There are discrepancies to how the first part of this verse is translated. The KJV writes it is
John who stands on the beach, but most modern translators believe it is the dragon, so the better paraphrase would
be, "On his way to wage war on the believers, the dragon stopped on the seashore."
This passage clearly references
Daniel chapter 7,
where four beasts, with the first three like a lion, a bear, and a leopard, represented a vast empire that oppressed
the faithful. This beast is specifically identified later, in Revelation 17:7-13, as the Roman empire, with the seven heads
representing the seven hills on which Rome was built. The blasphemous names further identify the beast as the
Roman empire, as the Emperors identified themselves as gods. The ten horns represent the ten Roman emperors since the
first emperor, Augustus: Tiberius (14-37), Caligula (37-41), Claudius (41-54), Nero (55-68), Galba (68-69), Otho (69),
Vitellius (69), Vespasian (69-79), Titus (79-81), and Domitian (81-96). The three after Nero ruled briefly in a period of
massive chaos, which lasted eighteen months until Vespasian became emperor.
In Daniel, the three animals listed are considered to be the Babylonian, Median, and Persian empires, with the fourth empire,
that of Alexander the Great, eclipsing the previous three. Similarly, the Roman empire eclipsed the glory of these four
previous empires. A horn always represented power, so ten horns represented a "fullness" of power. The symbolic
nature of this description is obvious when you try to imagine which of the seven heads had which of the ten horns!
The condemnation of the Roman empire in Revelation seems to conflict with the teachings of Jesus and the letters of Paul
instructing Christians to respect governmental authority -- until you put into the context of a ruler that has decreed
himself to be a god. When the government obstructs religion, the government must be opposed, as in the story of
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in
Daniel chapter 3
and the story of Daniel in the lion's den in
Daniel chapter 6.
Before we so quickly identify this first beast as the Roman empire, we should consider the arguments for interpreting this
beast also as the Antichrist.
1 John 2:18 warns
that the Antichrist will come, and that there are many antichrists already around.
2 Thessalonians 2:3-4
warns of the "lawless one" who will set himself up in the Temple and proclaim himself to be God.
The person of the Antichrist has been the subject of much speculation over the centuries. This person represents the opposite
of Christ, and is the incarnation of the Devil and of evil. That idea has deep roots, in both the Jewish faith in the person of Belial
(1 Samuel 2:12,
1 Kings 21:10, and
2 Chronicles 13:7)
and in pagan religions in the middle East. The Israelites had encountered an "antichrist" in the person of Antiochus
Epiphanes of Syria, who captures Palestine in 168 B.C. and erected an altar to Zeus in the Holy of Holies in the Jerusalem
Temple. He tried over the 3 1/2 years(!) of his domination of Jerusalem to eradicate Judaism, but was driven out of Palestine
by the Maccabees. The entire Roman Empire had encountered an "antichrist" in the person of Nero, who carried out
great atrocities against his family, the nobility, commoners, and particularly the Christians.
... and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
The beast, which I do believe represents the Roman empire, is the servant and tool of the dragon,
Satan. John draws by the picture of the woman, dragon, and beast the warning to the first century Christians that the
Roman empire's persecution of them is based in Satan's hate for God's followers.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: ...
This image had two parallel meanings for the first century Christian. There is an obvious parallel between
this beast and the Lamb that was slain, so Satan is claiming equality to God by copying God's work.
The second interpretation involves Nero's life story. When it was obvious that Nero's rule was over, he considered
fleeing to the Parthians, where he was popular, but instead he killed himself with a sword stroke to the head. Historians
tell us of three instances where Nero was widely reported to have come back from the dead, and the Parthians in those
instances were ready to proclaim him as their leader and attack Rome. The latest of these "sightings" happened in 88 A.D.,
just a few years before Revelation was written. Since Nero had so viciously persecuted Christians, this wounded head
underscored the evil intent of this beast towards Christians.
There is another consideration in the description of this wounded head that is not seen if the passage is read too quickly. This
one head received a fatal wound, but while the wound had healed, it does not say that the head was restored to full
usefulness. The point is that this beast cannot be killed through earthly measures, for normally fatal wounds are
irrelevant to the beast. The effect on the world would be the opinion that the power of this beast cannot be resisted.
... and all the world wondered after [was amazed by] the beast.
4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto
the beast? who is able to make war with him?
In worshipping the beast, the people were worshipping the dragon, a parallel to the Son and the Father. The
people's saying is a parody of praise to God given in
Exodus 15:11,
Psalm 35:10, and
Psalm 113:5,
except that God's power is in love, while the dragon's power is in war. This worship had a concrete parallel in the first
century in the world-wide worship of the emperor, which was especially powerful in Asia Minor.
As a side comment, the Jews had received special dispensation from Julius Caesar, and later from Augustus, that they could
pray for the Emperor in their places of worship, rather than being required to offer sacrifices in the temples to the
Emperor. Because the Christians were decreed under Nero to be a separate, and illegal, religion, the Christians received
persecution that the Jews did not.
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great [haughty] things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to
continue forty and two months.
6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
The blasphemies continued what were the names on the seven heads, and directly refers to the little horn on
the beast that uttered blasphemies in
Daniel 7:25. The
last part of verse six is often translated incorrectly in the same manner as the KJV has it above. What the original
Greek says is that the beast blasphemes God's dwelling place ("tabernacle"), which is where those who are
obedient to God dwell. The point is that God is not far away in heaven, but right there with the believers.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him
over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain
from [before] the foundation of the world.
The order of these prepositional phrases is unclear in the Greek. The phrase "before the foundation of
the world" can either be associated with "names are not been written" or with "the Lamb that was slain." Both of these
interpretations have the sense of God preparing our salvation before the start of time. The first one, the most common
translation, matches Revelation 17:8 and
Ephesians 1:4. The
alternate interpretation matches
1 Peter 1:19-20.
The persecution of the faithful continues to parallel the story in
Daniel 7, along
with the dominance by this beast of the entire known world.
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here
is the patience and the faith of the saints.
The KJV makes this passage sound like "an eye for an eye", but many modern translations interpret the
verb usage very differently, as a caution for believers. They translate the passage to read something like, "if you are to
be taken captive, you will be taken captive, and those who kill with the sword, will themselves be killed with the sword, so
you believers must endure in your faith."
John requests special attention from his audience, using the same method he did at the end of the letters to the
seven churches, for this saying calls believers to be faithful unto death. He requires of Christians not to fight persecution
with human strength but with Godly submission, quoting
Jeremiah 15:2. Likewise,
human violence is not an appropriate defense of Christianity; interpreted as the KJV words it, this passage sounds like what Jesus told Peter in
Matthew 26:52,
saying those who draw the sword will die by the sword. This also is an assurance of God's ultimate power, assuring that those
who execute the faithful will answer to God for their actions. The strength for Christians, then, is in endurance and faithfulness.
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Here is the completion of Satan's trinity. This second beast has more limited power than the first, because
this one comes out of the earth and only has two horns. It has the comely appearance of a lamb, but is truly as evil as a
dragon. Parallel this image to Jesus' teaching of false prophets as wolves in lambs clothing in
Matthew 7:15, and
indeed, this second beast is later identified as the false prophet (Revelation 16:13). There is also a parallel in the
two horns with the two witnesses of Revelation chapter 11.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell
therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
This second beast receives power from the first beast, whose power comes from the dragon. Given that
the first beast is the Roman empire, the second beast is most reasonably interpreted as the provincial governments
set up by Rome to enforce Rome's policies and emperor worship, as was the case in Pergamum. Others have interpreted this
beast as the Pope and the Roman Catholic church(!), although this interpretation is a huge stretch for this imagery, and
makes no sense in the historical context of the state of the church in Rome or Asia Minor in the first century.
13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; ...
Elijah called down fire down from heaven, as we discussed when we covered the two witnesses
after the sixth trumpet, so we see the second beast imitating what God had done through his servants. Bold miracles like
fire from heaven would cause people to be awed, but Jesus warned in his apocalyptic message in
Mark 13:22 that
false prophets would deceive people with signs and wonders. We do have record of noise machines owned by the Emperors
that would make sounds of thunder and flashes of fire, so the first century Christians would be familiar with this
trickery and deception.
... saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
15 And he had power to give life [breath] unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause
that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
The phrase "the image of the beast" occurs through the rest of Revelation (also in 14:9, 14:11, 15:2, 16:2,
19:20, 20:4) and each time it means that idol which unfaithful people worshipped. This image would have reminded the
first century Christians of the images of the emperor that were in all the regional government centers across the Roman
empire. The word for "life" is much better translated as "breath," and the Greek word used is pneuma, meaning breath or
wind. It is the same phrase used in 11:11 as God breathes life back into the two martyred witnesses -- but it can also
mean ventriloquism. There was a common illusion used in that period where a tube (actually a crane's neck) ran from the mouth
of a statue down to a hidden spot where a person spoke words that people perceived as coming from the statue.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark [better translated "to mark
themselves"] in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
The Greek wording shows that the people agreed to take on the mark, or even that they marked themselves. This
again mimics the mark that God gave to his elect after the sixth seal to protect them, with the same connotation that these
people were the servants or slaves of the beast. The position of the mark, on the right hand, indicates that the mark was in
plain view, that the people carried a visible testimony of their allegiance to the Beast. The same significance is seen
of the mark on the forehead, with the repetition of the two locations of the mark for emphasis. This marking was a parody of
the Jewish custom of when praying, wearing phylacteries on their left arm and forehead, containers that had verses from
the Old Testament.
The danger in this mark is the practical nature of the mark -- the purpose of the mark is to allow commerce, even though it
is a mark of the beast. Compare this compromise of beliefs to the situation in the Laodicean church in Revelation chapter 3,
where the church was so interested in economics that it had lost any effectiveness of its witness.
Also note the stark contrast between taking either the mark of the beast or the mark of God's elect. In our lives, and in the
lives of the Asia Minor churches in chapters 2 and 3, the choices didn't appear so clear! It was easy to bend a little, to compromise,
in order to get along more successfully. The imagery of visible marks challenges Christians then and now to consider that what
may seem like minor decisions to us are really visible and significant choices to follow God or follow Satan.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his
number is Six hundred threescore and six.
John uses this same reference to "wisdom" in Revelation 17:9, where he explains that the seven
heads of the first beast are the "seven hills on which the harlot sitteth," which both the early Christians and we easily
identify as Rome. John must have meant as obvious a reference for "666" as for the seven hills, except that we have lost
that reference. In fact, Christian scholars as early as the second century were in the dark as to what was meant by "666."
It was apparently common at that time to identify a person by the number of their name, as in a wall in Pompeii on
which someone had written "I love her whose number is 545." We're not sure how they intended to create numbers from names,
but we can devise ways that using the letters of a name as roman numerals can give us 666, and people have used that
tactic to get "666" out of the Hebrew version of the name "Nero Caesar," although we don't see other references to
Hebrew in Revelation, because the dominant languages for Christians were Aramaic and Latin. Also, this same roman numeral
trick works for the Latin phrase Vicarius Filii Dei, one of the titles for the Pope. By using a numeric code for the
letters in "Hitler," where A=100, B=101, etc., the letters for Hitler add up to 666. Another approach is based on some old
manuscripts that list the number as "616," which is the sum of the letters for the Latin word "Nero."
There is another explanation that appears to make better sense. The Greek name of Jesus can be calculated into the
number "888," where each digit is one greater than the perfect number "7." The opposite of this would be the number "666,"
with digits that represent something notably imperfect. Repeating the imperfect number emphasizes the imperfection, and
repeating it three times underscores the false trinity of the dragon and the two beasts.
In my opinion, the first beast is the Roman empire, the second beast are the regional satellite governments from Rome, and
the "666" number is a numerological emphasis on the evil parody of the holy trinity.
Interpretation
To those who seek a literal, modern-day interpretation for Revelation, the person of the Antichrist is a
dominating question. Both Lindsey and Van Kampen believe that the Antichrist will be the leader of the world-wide empire
that will firmly oppress Christianity, and that this person will arise out of Roman / Germanic heritage. Van Kampen goes so
far as to require this person to have died of a head wound and come back to life, and to be immediately recognizable to
the world population upon his resurrection, therefore Hitler must be the Antichrist. Lindsey believes the second beast, the
prophet of the Antichrist, will be a Jewish person, based on an interpretation of the beast coming out of "the land."
However, this literal interpretation of a single "antichrist" minimizes the suffering through the centuries that Christians
have experienced under the antichrists of the past. Even John interpreted the concept of the antichrist as applying to
many people, for in
1 John 2:18, he
warns that "even now many antichrists have come."
Applicability for Today
Bruce Metzger, in the commentary Breaking the Code makes the following observation about the
underlying meaning behind this chapter:
The profound religious insight that lies behind these kaleidoscopic pictures in chapter 13 is that men and women are so
constituted as to worship some absolute power, and if they do not worship the true and real Power behind the universe,
they will construct a god for themselves and give allegiance to that. In the last analysis, it is always a choice between the
power that operates through inflicting suffering, that is, the power of the beast, and the power that operates through
accepting suffering, namely, the power of the Lamb.
|